Global Container Closure Integrity Testing Services Market (2022 to 2035) - by Type of Container Closure Systems, Type of Container Materials Tested and Key Geographical Regions
DUBLIN, March 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Container Closure Integrity Testing Services Market by Type of Container Closure Systems, Type of Container Materials Tested, and Key Geographical Regions: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2022-2035" report has been added toResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
This report features an extensive study of the current landscape and the likely future potential of container closure integrity testing service providers, over the next decade. The study also features an in-depth analysis, highlighting the capabilities of various industry stakeholders engaged in this field. Packaging is considered a critical aspect of pharmaceutical manufacturing. It is, therefore, imperative for drug manufacturers to ensure that formulations enclosed in primary containers are safe for consumption / administration. Despite being well established, there are several concerns associated with the drug packaging process, such as the risk of contamination, filling errors (inaccurate dose dispensation), complex packaging systems, integrity related concerns (pores, cracks and scratches) of container closure systems (such as vials, syringes, cartridges, IV bags, ampoules), and labelling-related issues. In fact, experts believe that around 80% of product recalls may be attributed to packaging-related concerns.
To ensure the safety of consumers, a lot of effort is put to eliminate contamination, filling errors and maintain integrity of packaged formulations. The industry has come up with several innovative techniques and technologies for the evaluation of both primary and secondary packaging components in order to maintain the sterility and stability of drug product. Moreover, regulatory bodies have enforced stringent guidelines to evaluate the integrity of container closure systems. As a result, container closure integrity testing has become a critical part of the overall manufacturing process. The techniques used for this purpose ensure precision and accuracy in leak detection, rapid results, non-destructive testing, affordable, reliable and easy integration in the manufacturing process.Despite the benefits of container closure integrity testing methods, there is no one-size -fits-all solution to evaluate all the types of primary packaging. Additionally, the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies face various challenges in installing container closure integrity testing equipment due to limited expertise and infrastructure. Owing to these challenges, the drug manufacturers rely on container closure integrity testing service providers, which have well-equipped infrastructure and novel technology platforms, along with the required expertise. Moreover, outsourcing of container closure integrity testing assists the innovators to serve the clients in a timely and regulation-compliant manner. With the anticipated rise in the drug product market, the demand for packaging services is likely to increase in the future; this, in turn, will likely result in rise in demand for integrity testing services. Further advancements in testing methods and cost saving potential of such methods (by reducing the product wastage and ensuring the drug and patients safety) are expected to drive steady growth in the overall container closure integrity testing services market in the foreseen future.In addition to other elements, the study includes:
Key Questions Answered
Key Topics Covered:1. PREFACE2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY3. INTRODUCTION4. MARKET LANDSCAPE5. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS5.1. Chapter Overview5.2. Methodology5.3. Key Parameters5.4. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in North America5.5. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in Europe and Asia-Pacific5.6. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in One Analytical Facility5.7. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in More than Analytical Facility6. CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN NORTH AMERICA: COMPANY PROFILES6.1. Chapter Overview6.2. Berkshire Sterile Manufacturing6.2.1. Company Overview6.2.2. Financial Information6.2.3. Service Portfolio6.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook6.3. Curia6.3.1. Company Overview6.3.2. Financial Information6.3.3. Service Portfolio6.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook6.4. DDL6.4.1. Company Overview6.4.2. Financial Information6.4.3. Service Portfolio6.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook6.5. Nelson Labs6.5.1. Company Overview6.5.2. Financial Information6.5.3. Service Portfolio6.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7. CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN EUROPE: COMPANY PROFILES7.1. Chapter Overview7.2. Confarma7.2.1. Company Overview7.2.2. Financial Information7.2.3. Service Portfolio7.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.3. Eurofins7.3.1. Company Overview7.3.2. Financial Information7.3.3. Service Portfolio7.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.4. SGS7.4.1. Company Overview7.4.2. Financial Information7.4.3. Service Portfolio7.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.5. Stevanato7.5.1. Company Overview7.5.2. Financial Information7.5.3. Service Portfolio7.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.6. Wilco7.6.1. Company Overview7.6.2. Financial Information7.6.3. Service Portfolio7.6.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook8. CASE STUDY: MARKET LANDSCAPE OF CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING EQUIPMENT PROVIDERS8.1. Chapter Overview8.2. Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment: Market Landscape8.2.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation8.2.2. Analysis by Key Features8.2.3. Analysis by Type(s) of Analytical Method(s) Offered8.2.4. Analysis by Type(s) of Container Material(s) Tested8.2.5. Analysis by Type(s) of Container(s) Tested8.3. Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment Providers: Developer Landscape8.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment8.3.2. Analysis by Company Size8.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters8.3.4. Analysis by Company Size and Location of Headquarters8.3.5. Leading Developers: Analysis by Number of Products9. PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS10. REGIONAL CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT11. BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS11.1. Chapter Overview11.2. Methodology Assumptions and Key Assumption11.3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Deterministic Methods11.4. Advantages and Disadvantages of Probabilistic Methods11.5. Benchmarking of CCIT Techniques11.5.1. Distribution by Type(s) of Container(s) Tested11.5.2. Distribution by Type of Container Material Tested11.5.3. Distribution by Key Geographical Regions12. CASE STUDY: ROBOTICS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING12.1. Chapter Overview12.2. Role of Robots in the Pharmaceutical Industry12.2.1. Key Considerations for Selecting a Robotic System12.2.2. Advantages of Robotic Systems12.2.3. Disadvantages of Robotic Systems12.3. Companies Providing Robots for Pharmaceutical Industry12.4. Companies Providing Equipment Integrated with Robotic Systems for Pharmaceutical Packaging13. DEMAND ANALYSIS14. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS15. SWOT ANALYSIS16. CONCLUSION17. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS18. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA19. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONSFor more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/cctuzj
Media Contact:
Research and MarketsLaura Wood, Senior Manager[email protected]For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900U.S. Fax: 646-607-1904Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716
SOURCE Research and Markets
